18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Agilis CrossClimate vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Kumho (55%). The first tyre test of Michelin Agilis CrossClimate was done in 2022, compared to 2018 when was the Kumho Ecsta PS71 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Michelin Agilis CrossClimate dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (76%) of the Kumho Ecsta PS71 also have A wet ratings.

Test Profile

Michelin
Agilis CrossClimate
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
2
15
Best position
#1
#2
Average position
2.0
9.0
Latest test
2022
2025
Available sizes
36
225

Snow

Snow
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
82%

Wet

Wet
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet braking
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Wet handling
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
86%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
93%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Exterior noise
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
93%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
93%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry braking
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
94%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Dry handling
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison