Comparison: Michelin Agilis CrossClimate vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Premium

Michelin

Agilis CrossClimate

R15 – R17

VS

Premium

Hankook

ION Evo

e.Ziex

9.0

R15 – R21

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Agilis CrossClimate

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Number of tests

2

1

3

Best position

#1

#2

Average position

2.0

1.0

3.7

Latest test

2022

2025

Available sizes

36

64

34

Wet

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate

88%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet braking

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate

89%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate

91%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet handling

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate

86%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Snow

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate

82%

Dry

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate

93%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate

94%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate

92%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Comfort

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate

93%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate

93%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate

75%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate

75%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin Agilis CrossClimate vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Agilis CrossClimate

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison