18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Agilis CrossClimate vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Michelin
Agilis CrossClimate
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
2
18
1
Best position
#1
#1
#1
Average position
2.0
6.1
1.0
Latest test
2022
2024
2025
Available sizes
36
47
64

Wet

Wet
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet handling
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet braking
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Snow

Snow
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
82%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry handling
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
91%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison