18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Agilis CrossClimate vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Continental (73%). The first tyre test of Michelin Agilis CrossClimate was done in 2022, compared to 2025 when was the Continental UltraContact NXT first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Michelin Agilis CrossClimate dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Continental UltraContact NXT also have A wet ratings.

Test Profile

Michelin
Agilis CrossClimate
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
2
2
Best position
#1
#1
Average position
2.0
1.0
Latest test
2022
2025
Available sizes
36
23

Snow

Snow
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
82%

Wet

Wet
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Wet handling
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
86%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Wet braking
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
91%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
93%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Dry braking
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
94%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Dry handling
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
93%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Exterior noise
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
93%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison