Comparison: Michelin AGILIS ALPIN vs. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs. Kumho PorTran CW51

Premium

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

R15 – R17

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

R14 – R17

Upper-middle

Kumho

PorTran CW51

R14 – R17

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

Turanza T005

Test Profile

AGILIS ALPIN

EuroWinter VAN01

PorTran CW51

Number of tests

2

1

Best position

#3

#6

#8

Average position

3.0

6.0

8.0

Latest test

2019

Available sizes

23

32

21

Performance comparison

Wet Performance

73%

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

67%

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

65%

Kumho

PorTran CW51

Wet Braking

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

80%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

71%

Kumho PorTran CW51

49%

Wet Handling

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

70%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

57%

Kumho PorTran CW51

46%

Wet Circle Cornering

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

72%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

72%

Kumho PorTran CW51

72%

Aquaplaning Longitudinal

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

67%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

67%

Kumho PorTran CW51

78%

Aquaplaning Cross

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

78%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

67%

Kumho PorTran CW51

78%

Dry Performance

78%

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

89%

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

78%

Kumho

PorTran CW51

Dry Braking

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

78%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Kumho PorTran CW51

78%

Snow Performance

80%

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

49%

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

70%

Kumho

PorTran CW51

Snow Braking

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

78%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

56%

Kumho PorTran CW51

78%

Snow Traction

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

83%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

50%

Kumho PorTran CW51

72%

Snow Handling

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

80%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

40%

Kumho PorTran CW51

60%

Ice Performance

84%

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

86%

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

78%

Kumho

PorTran CW51

Ice Braking Abs

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

81%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

86%

Kumho PorTran CW51

81%

Ice Lateral Guidance

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

86%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

86%

Kumho PorTran CW51

74%

Comfort & Noise

67%

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

81%

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

71%

Kumho

PorTran CW51

Noise Exterior

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

62%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

91%

Kumho PorTran CW51

71%

Noise Interior

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

71%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

71%

Kumho PorTran CW51

71%

Economy

87%

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

89%

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

76%

Kumho

PorTran CW51

Fuel Efficiency

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

84%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Kumho PorTran CW51

84%

Mileage

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

89%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Kumho PorTran CW51

67%

Tests used in comparison

Organization	Season	Year	Dimension
ADAC	Winter	2019	205/65 R16	View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Comparison: Michelin AGILIS ALPIN vs. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs. Kumho PorTran CW51

AGILIS ALPIN

EuroWinter VAN01

PorTran CW51

Test Profile

Performance comparison

Tests used in comparison

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison