Comparison: Michelin AGILIS ALPIN vs. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak W810

Premium

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

R15 – R17

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

R14 – R17

Premium

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

R14 – R17

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

Turanza T005

Test Profile

AGILIS ALPIN

EuroWinter VAN01

Blizzak W810

Number of tests

2

1

Best position

#3

#6

#7

Average position

3.0

6.0

7.0

Latest test

2019

Available sizes

23

32

56

Performance comparison

Wet Performance

73%

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

67%

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

56%

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

Wet Braking

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

80%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

40%

Wet Handling

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

70%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

57%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

34%

Wet Circle Cornering

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

72%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

61%

Aquaplaning Longitudinal

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

67%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Aquaplaning Cross

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

78%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Dry Performance

78%

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

89%

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

78%

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

Dry Braking

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

78%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Snow Performance

80%

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

49%

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

79%

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

Snow Braking

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

78%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

56%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Snow Traction

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

83%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

50%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

83%

Snow Handling

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

80%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

40%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

76%

Ice Performance

84%

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

86%

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

74%

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

Ice Braking Abs

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

81%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

74%

Ice Lateral Guidance

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

86%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

74%

Comfort & Noise

67%

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

81%

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

56%

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

Noise Exterior

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

62%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

91%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

44%

Noise Interior

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

71%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Economy

87%

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

89%

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

76%

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

Fuel Efficiency

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

84%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

84%

Mileage

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

89%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Tests used in comparison

Organization	Season	Year	Dimension
ADAC	Winter	2019	205/65 R16	View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Comparison: Michelin AGILIS ALPIN vs. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak W810

AGILIS ALPIN

EuroWinter VAN01

Blizzak W810

Test Profile

Performance comparison

Tests used in comparison

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison