Comparison: Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van vs. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs. Kumho PorTran CW51 vs. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

Budget

Matador

MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

R14 – R16

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

Turanza T005

Test Profile

MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

EuroWinter VAN01

PorTran CW51

AGILIS ALPIN

Number of tests

1

2

Best position

#9

#6

#8

#3

Average position

9.0

6.0

8.0

3.0

Latest test

2019

Available sizes

18

32

21

23

Performance comparison

Wet Performance

69%

Matador

MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

67%

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

65%

Kumho

PorTran CW51

73%

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

Wet Braking

Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

62%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

71%

Kumho PorTran CW51

49%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

80%

Wet Handling

Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

66%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

57%

Kumho PorTran CW51

46%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

70%

Wet Circle Cornering

Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

72%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

72%

Kumho PorTran CW51

72%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

72%

Aquaplaning Longitudinal

Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

67%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

67%

Kumho PorTran CW51

78%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

67%

Aquaplaning Cross

Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

78%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

67%

Kumho PorTran CW51

78%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

78%

Dry Performance

71%

Matador

MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

89%

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

78%

Kumho

PorTran CW51

78%

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

Dry Braking

Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

71%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Kumho PorTran CW51

78%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

78%

Snow Performance

77%

Matador

MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

49%

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

70%

Kumho

PorTran CW51

80%

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

Snow Braking

Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

78%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

56%

Kumho PorTran CW51

78%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

78%

Snow Traction

Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

72%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

50%

Kumho PorTran CW51

72%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

83%

Snow Handling

Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

80%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

40%

Kumho PorTran CW51

60%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

80%

Ice Performance

74%

Matador

MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

86%

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

78%

Kumho

PorTran CW51

84%

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

Ice Braking Abs

Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

74%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

86%

Kumho PorTran CW51

81%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

81%

Ice Lateral Guidance

Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

74%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

86%

Kumho PorTran CW51

74%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

86%

Comfort & Noise

55%

Matador

MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

81%

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

71%

Kumho

PorTran CW51

67%

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

Noise Exterior

Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

42%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

91%

Kumho PorTran CW51

71%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

62%

Noise Interior

Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

67%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

71%

Kumho PorTran CW51

71%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

71%

Economy

69%

Matador

MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

89%

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

76%

Kumho

PorTran CW51

87%

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

Fuel Efficiency

Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

71%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Kumho PorTran CW51

84%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

84%

Mileage

Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

67%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Kumho PorTran CW51

67%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

89%

Tests used in comparison

Organization	Season	Year	Dimension
ADAC	Winter	2019	205/65 R16	View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Comparison: Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van vs. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs. Kumho PorTran CW51 vs. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

EuroWinter VAN01

PorTran CW51

AGILIS ALPIN

Test Profile

Performance comparison

Tests used in comparison

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison