18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Matador MP93 Nordicca vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Matador (40%). In this particular case, the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ has a better rating of 87% compared to 40% of the Matador MP93 Nordicca. The first tyre test of Matador MP93 Nordicca was done in 2022, compared to 2025 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Matador MP93 Nordicca has C wet grip rating, whereas 77% of Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ has B rating.

Test Profile

Matador
MP93 Nordicca
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Number of tests
4
3
Best position
#11
#4
Average position
23.8
4.3
Latest test
2025
2025
Available sizes
92
97

Wet

Wet
Matador MP93 Nordicca
39%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Matador MP93 Nordicca
3%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Wet braking
Matador MP93 Nordicca
37%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Wet handling
Matador MP93 Nordicca
53%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%

Snow

Snow
Matador MP93 Nordicca
49%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Snow traction
Matador MP93 Nordicca
35%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
76%
Snow braking
Matador MP93 Nordicca
44%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
80%
Snow handling
Matador MP93 Nordicca
61%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%

Dry

Dry
Matador MP93 Nordicca
56%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Dry braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%

Ice

Ice
Matador MP93 Nordicca
30%

Costs

Costs
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison