18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Matador MP47 Hectorra 3 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (59%) than Matador (9%). The first tyre test of Matador MP47 Hectorra 3 was done in 2019, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecsta HS52 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 54% of Matador MP47 Hectorra 3 has C wet grip rating, whereas 75% of Kumho Ecsta HS52 has A rating.

Test Profile

Matador
MP47 Hectorra 3
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
5
10
Best position
#5
#2
Average position
25.0
6.0
Latest test
2023
2026
Available sizes
134
104

Wet

Wet
Matador MP47 Hectorra 3
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Wet braking
Matador MP47 Hectorra 3
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Aquaplaning - cross
Matador MP47 Hectorra 3
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Wet handling
Matador MP47 Hectorra 3
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Wet circle cornering
Matador MP47 Hectorra 3
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Matador MP47 Hectorra 3
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Dry

Dry
Matador MP47 Hectorra 3
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Dry braking
Matador MP47 Hectorra 3
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Dry handling
Matador MP47 Hectorra 3
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%

Comfort

Comfort
Matador MP47 Hectorra 3
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Exterior noise
Matador MP47 Hectorra 3
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Costs

Costs
Matador MP47 Hectorra 3
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Rolling resistance
Matador MP47 Hectorra 3
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison