Comparison: Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Budget

Laufenn

S Fit EQ+ LK01

R15 – R20

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

e.Ziex

ION Evo

9.0

R17 – R22

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

S Fit EQ+ LK01

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Number of tests

6

3

1

Best position

#9

#2

#1

Average position

20.2

3.7

1.0

Latest test

2026

2025

Available sizes

128

34

64

Wet

Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01

66%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Wet braking

Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01

73%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Wet circle cornering

Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01

84%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01

58%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01

73%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet handling

Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01

33%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry

Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01

87%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01

89%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Dry handling

Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01

85%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Comfort

Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01

83%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Costs

Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01

75%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

S Fit EQ+ LK01

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison