Comparison: Laufenn I FIT Plus vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Budget

Laufenn

I FIT Plus

VS

WinterCraft WP52+

Blizzak LM-005

8.2

R14 – R22

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

I FIT Plus

WinterCraft WP52+

Blizzak LM-005

Number of tests

6

3

49

Best position

#10

#4

#1

Average position

14.5

4.3

3.2

Latest test

2023

2025

2024

Available sizes

—

97

213

Wet

Laufenn I FIT Plus

59%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Wet handling

Laufenn I FIT Plus

60%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

93%

Aquaplaning - cross

Laufenn I FIT Plus

51%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Laufenn I FIT Plus

60%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Wet braking

Laufenn I FIT Plus

59%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

Wet circle cornering

Laufenn I FIT Plus

59%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Snow

Laufenn I FIT Plus

80%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Snow cornering

Laufenn I FIT Plus

84%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

77%

Snow traction

Laufenn I FIT Plus

76%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Snow braking

Laufenn I FIT Plus

74%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Snow handling

Laufenn I FIT Plus

86%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

72%

Costs

Laufenn I FIT Plus

68%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Mileage

Laufenn I FIT Plus

64%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

64%

Price/value

Laufenn I FIT Plus

86%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

60%

Rolling resistance

Laufenn I FIT Plus

66%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

87%

Comfort

Laufenn I FIT Plus

75%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Exterior noise

Laufenn I FIT Plus

80%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

Comfort

Laufenn I FIT Plus

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

83%

Dry

Laufenn I FIT Plus

71%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Dry braking

Laufenn I FIT Plus

75%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Dry handling

Laufenn I FIT Plus

67%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Laufenn I FIT Plus vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

I FIT Plus

WinterCraft WP52+

Blizzak LM-005

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Costs

Comfort

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison