18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Laufenn G Fit 4S vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Laufenn) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Laufenn (64%). In this particular case, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV has a better rating of 89% compared to 64% of the Laufenn G Fit 4S. The first tyre test of Laufenn G Fit 4S was done in 2021, compared to 2023 when was the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 50% of Laufenn G Fit 4S has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV has B rating.

Test Profile

Laufenn
G Fit 4S
Michelin
CrossClimate 2 SUV
Number of tests
5
2
Best position
#10
#1
Average position
14.8
1.5
Latest test
2025
2024
Available sizes
4
54

Wet

Wet
Laufenn G Fit 4S
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
75%
Wet handling
Laufenn G Fit 4S
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
71%
Aquaplaning - cross
Laufenn G Fit 4S
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
81%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Laufenn G Fit 4S
69%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
Wet braking
Laufenn G Fit 4S
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
70%

Snow

Snow
Laufenn G Fit 4S
70%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
Snow handling
Laufenn G Fit 4S
57%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
81%
Snow traction
Laufenn G Fit 4S
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%

Costs

Costs
Laufenn G Fit 4S
66%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%

Dry

Dry
Laufenn G Fit 4S
72%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
77%
Dry braking
Laufenn G Fit 4S
56%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
80%
Dry handling
Laufenn G Fit 4S
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
74%

Comfort

Comfort
Laufenn G Fit 4S
51%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
82%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison