Comparison: Laufenn G Fit 4S vs. Dunlop All Season 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Sailun Atrezzo 4Seasons vs. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S vs. Falken EuroALL Season AS210

This head-to-head compares the Laufenn G Fit 4S and the Dunlop All Season 2 across multiple AUTOBILD tests. Both are positioned as all‑round, all‑season tyres; neither model has been replaced by a newer successor. For manufacturer information see Laufenn and Dunlop.

Test summary and positions

• In the 30‑tyre AUTOBILD test the Laufenn finished 10th while the Dunlop placed 15th.


• In a larger 37‑tyre AUTOBILD comparison the Dunlop ranked 11th vs the Laufenn at 17th.


• AUTOBILD 2025 notes: Laufenn is a “wet specialist” with an excellent price/value ratio but is the loudest tyre and slightly weaker on dry roads; Dunlop is a “long‑distance champion” with excellent cost and mileage figures but shows weaknesses in dry grip and aquaplaning.


• AUTOBILD 2024 highlights Dunlop’s balanced performance and best mileage in the test, while flagging somewhat modest lateral grip on snow and longer wet braking distances.

Strengths — Laufenn G Fit 4S

• Wet performance: multiple notes in tests highlight outstanding wet handling and wet circle cornering — the profile and compound favour grip in rain.


• Value for money: consistently called out for competitive pricing; strong cost/performance ratio.


• Dry handling (in some tests): praised for nimble handling characteristics in certain comparisons.

Weaknesses — Laufenn G Fit 4S

• Noise: reported as the loudest among candidates in one recent test.


• Dry consistency: some test summaries point to slightly weaker performance on dry surfaces compared with premium rivals.

Strengths — Dunlop All Season 2

• Mileage and running costs: top scorer for kilometer performance and cost efficiency — ideal for high‑mileage drivers.


• Snow performance: noted for strong traction in snow in specific tests, making it a reliable all‑season choice for winter conditions.


• Balanced package: described as delivering an overall good performance level without major weaknesses in many test reports.

Weaknesses — Dunlop All Season 2

• Wet braking / aquaplaning: some tests show longer wet braking distances and weaker aquaplaning resistance than the best wet specialists.


• Dry handling: moderate shortcomings in dry lateral grip were noted in a couple of reports.

Overall verdict
Both tyres are solid choices in the all‑season segment but cater to different priorities. The Laufenn G Fit 4S is the better pick if your priority is wet grip and upfront value — it shines in wet cornering and handling, though at the cost of higher noise and some dry‑road compromises. The Dunlop All Season 2 is the more rounded, durability‑focused option: it achieves better mileage, excellent cost efficiency and stronger snow traction, and therefore earns a slight edge across the full set of tests. This is reflected in our aggregated ratings (Dunlop 66% vs Laufenn 64%) and by Dunlop’s higher placement in the larger AUTOBILD field.

Bottom line: choose Laufenn for wet‑biased performance and low purchase price; choose Dunlop for longevity, balanced seasonal performance and best overall value for high‑mileage drivers.