Segment
1. Dunlop All Season 2 Premium2. Laufenn G Fit 4S Lowcost
Comparison: Laufenn G Fit 4S vs. Dunlop All Season 2
Table of contents:
| # | Laufenn G Fit 4S
| Dunlop All Season 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
This head-to-head compares the Laufenn G Fit 4S and the Dunlop All Season 2 across multiple AUTOBILD tests. Both are positioned as all‑round, all‑season tyres; neither model has been replaced by a newer successor. For manufacturer information see Laufenn and Dunlop.
Test summary and positions
- In the 30‑tyre AUTOBILD test the Laufenn finished 10th while the Dunlop placed 15th.
- In a larger 37‑tyre AUTOBILD comparison the Dunlop ranked 11th vs the Laufenn at 17th.
- AUTOBILD 2025 notes: Laufenn is a “wet specialist” with an excellent price/value ratio but is the loudest tyre and slightly weaker on dry roads; Dunlop is a “long‑distance champion” with excellent cost and mileage figures but shows weaknesses in dry grip and aquaplaning.
- AUTOBILD 2024 highlights Dunlop’s balanced performance and best mileage in the test, while flagging somewhat modest lateral grip on snow and longer wet braking distances.
Strengths — Laufenn G Fit 4S
- Wet performance: multiple notes in tests highlight outstanding wet handling and wet circle cornering — the profile and compound favour grip in rain.
- Value for money: consistently called out for competitive pricing; strong cost/performance ratio.
- Dry handling (in some tests): praised for nimble handling characteristics in certain comparisons.
Weaknesses — Laufenn G Fit 4S
- Noise: reported as the loudest among candidates in one recent test.
- Dry consistency: some test summaries point to slightly weaker performance on dry surfaces compared with premium rivals.
Strengths — Dunlop All Season 2
- Mileage and running costs: top scorer for kilometer performance and cost efficiency — ideal for high‑mileage drivers.
- Snow performance: noted for strong traction in snow in specific tests, making it a reliable all‑season choice for winter conditions.
- Balanced package: described as delivering an overall good performance level without major weaknesses in many test reports.
Weaknesses — Dunlop All Season 2
- Wet braking / aquaplaning: some tests show longer wet braking distances and weaker aquaplaning resistance than the best wet specialists.
- Dry handling: moderate shortcomings in dry lateral grip were noted in a couple of reports.
Overall verdict
Both tyres are solid choices in the all‑season segment but cater to different priorities. The Laufenn G Fit 4S is the better pick if your priority is wet grip and upfront value — it shines in wet cornering and handling, though at the cost of higher noise and some dry‑road compromises. The Dunlop All Season 2 is the more rounded, durability‑focused option: it achieves better mileage, excellent cost efficiency and stronger snow traction, and therefore earns a slight edge across the full set of tests. This is reflected in our aggregated ratings (Dunlop 66% vs Laufenn 64%) and by Dunlop’s higher placement in the larger AUTOBILD field.
Bottom line: choose Laufenn for wet‑biased performance and low purchase price; choose Dunlop for longevity, balanced seasonal performance and best overall value for high‑mileage drivers.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Laufenn G Fit 4S 14.8
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Laufenn G Fit 4S Good
Worst rating in test
2. Laufenn G Fit 4S Good
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | |||
| Laufenn G Fit 4S Rating: Good | 2 | 2+ | 2- | 2 | |||
| Dunlop All Season 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 1- | 2- | 3+ | 1 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 38.0 | 43.9 | |||||
| Laufenn G Fit 4S | 42.1 | 45.8 | |||||
| Dunlop All Season 2 | 42.5 | 49.2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36.8 | 50.5 | |||||
| Laufenn G Fit 4S | 42.7 | 58.2 | |||||
| Dunlop All Season 2 | 41.6 | 57.3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
