Segment
2. Laufenn G Fit 4S Lowcost
Comparison: Laufenn G Fit 4S vs. Continental AllSeasonContact 2
Table of contents:
| # | Laufenn G Fit 4S
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
This comparison looks at two popular all‑season tyres tested across multiple Auto Bild test programmes: the Laufenn G Fit 4S and the Continental AllSeasonContact 2. Below we summarise test results, strengths and weaknesses and give a clear verdict on which tyre performs better overall.
Quick facts & test scores
- Laufenn G Fit 4S — our aggregated score: 64%. Test positions: 10/30 and 17/37 in Auto Bild test runs. Manufacturer: Laufenn.
- Continental AllSeasonContact 2 — our aggregated score: 88%. Test positions: 7/30 and 3/37, consistently in the top third. Made in CZ. Manufacturer: Continental. (Note: this model follows the original Continental AllSeasonContact.)
Summary of comparative test performance
- Wet performance: Continental is rated higher for wet handling and wet circle cornering and is repeatedly highlighted as a strong performer on wet surfaces. Laufenn is a "Nässespezialist" (wet specialist) in one summary but overall shows weaker wet reserves compared with Continental in head‑to‑head placements.
- Dry handling: Both tyres score well for dry handling in individual test metrics, but Continental’s dynamic behaviour earns better overall marks and higher test ranks.
- Snow & winter behaviour: Continental shows clear advantages in snow traction and short braking on ice/snow, described as a balanced multitalent with strong winter performance. Laufenn performs acceptably but is not class‑leading in snow.
- Noise & comfort: Laufenn is noted as the loudest rolling candidate in one test summary; Continental scores better for exterior noise and rolling resistance.
- Durability / mileage & economy: Continental’s only often‑mentioned downside is slightly reduced mileage expectations and a higher price point; Laufenn is repeatedly praised for value for money.
Strengths and weaknesses
- Laufenn G Fit 4S: Strengths — very good price/value, competent wet grip in some tests, acceptable dry handling. Weaknesses — noisy rolling, slightly weaker dry grip and overall test rank is mid‑table (64% overall).
- Continental AllSeasonContact 2: Strengths — consistently high marks for wet and snow handling, sportier and safer dynamics on wet roads, low exterior noise and good rolling resistance. Weaknesses — higher price and slightly limited mileage compared with budget rivals.
Which tyre is better overall?
Across the available Auto Bild tests and our aggregated scores, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 outperforms the Laufenn G Fit 4S in most key categories: wet braking and handling, snow traction and noise/efficiency metrics. Continental’s test positions (top‑10 and top‑3 placements) and an 88% score place it clearly ahead of the Laufenn (64%).
Recommendation
If you prioritise all‑round safety, wet and winter performance and lower exterior noise — and you’re prepared to pay a premium — choose the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 (manufacturer: Continental). If your budget is tight and you value price/performance above the last margin of wet/dry grip or noise, the Laufenn G Fit 4S (manufacturer: Laufenn) is a sound budget all‑season choice.
Neither model has been superseded by a newer replacement in our dataset — Continental’s AllSeasonContact 2 is the follow‑on to the original AllSeasonContact, but no later replacement is listed.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Laufenn G Fit 4S 14.8
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Exemplary2. Laufenn G Fit 4S Good
Worst rating in test
1. Laufenn G Fit 4S Good
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | |||
| Laufenn G Fit 4S Rating: Good | 2 | 2+ | 2- | 2 | |||
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 38.0 | 43.9 | |||||
| Laufenn G Fit 4S | 42.1 | 45.8 | |||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 | 41.5 | 44.9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36.8 | 50.5 | |||||
| Laufenn G Fit 4S | 42.7 | 58.2 | |||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 | 40.0 | 53.6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
