Comparison: Lassa Competus Winter 2+ vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Budget

Lassa

Competus Winter 2+

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Competus Winter 2+

Primacy 4+

UltraGrip Performance+

Blizzak 6

ION Evo

Number of tests

1

13

23

14

1

Best position

#4

#1

Average position

4.0

4.3

3.3

3.6

1.0

Latest test

2025

Available sizes

9

123

176

188

64

Wet

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

93%

Michelin Primacy 4+

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Wet braking

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

94%

Michelin Primacy 4+

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Aquaplaning - cross

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

100%

Michelin Primacy 4+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Wet circle cornering

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

89%

Michelin Primacy 4+

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

89%

Michelin Primacy 4+

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet handling

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

95%

Michelin Primacy 4+

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Snow

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Snow traction

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

Snow braking

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Snow handling

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Dry

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

87%

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry performance

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

59%

Dry braking

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

87%

Michelin Primacy 4+

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Dry handling

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

86%

Michelin Primacy 4+

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Comfort

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

76%

Michelin Primacy 4+

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

87%

Michelin Primacy 4+

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Comfort

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

65%

Michelin Primacy 4+

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Costs

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

84%

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolling resistance

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

84%

Michelin Primacy 4+

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Lassa Competus Winter 2+ vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Competus Winter 2+

Primacy 4+

UltraGrip Performance+

Blizzak 6

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison