Segment
1. Lassa Competus Winter 2+ Lowcost2. Kormoran SUV SNOW Lowcost
Comparison: Lassa Competus Winter 2+ vs. Kormoran SUV SNOW
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Turkey (Lassa) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Kormoran). Lassa is a brand that belongs to the Bridgestone group. Kormoran is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Lassa winter tyres are slightly better rated (29%) than Kormoran (14%). In this particular case, the Lassa Competus Winter 2+ has a better rating of 31% compared to 22% of the Kormoran SUV SNOW. Important for this comparison is also the Autozurnal 2025 215/65 R17 test, where both the Competus Winter 2+ and the SUV SNOW were tested.
| # | Lassa Competus Winter 2+
| Kormoran SUV SNOW
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kormoran SUV SNOW Weak
Worst rating in test
1. Kormoran SUV SNOW Weak
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 101.1 | 87.2 | 96.2 | 94.9 | |||
| Lassa Competus Winter 2+ Rating: Weak | 98.1 | 100.7 | 97.4 | 96.1 | |||
| Kormoran SUV Snow Rating: Weak | 96.6 | 94.6 | 96.2 | 98.8 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
