18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Lassa Competus Winter 2+ vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Test Profile

Lassa
Competus Winter 2+
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Number of tests
1
17
3
14
23
Best position
#4
#1
#2
#1
#1
Average position
4.0
1.7
3.3
3.6
3.3
Latest test
2025
2025
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
9
80
40
188
176

Wet

Wet
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Wet handling
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
95%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Wet braking
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
94%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Aquaplaning - cross
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Wet circle cornering
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%

Snow

Snow
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Snow braking
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Snow handling
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Snow traction
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Snow acceleration
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
97%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
99%

Dry

Dry
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Dry performance
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
72%
Dry braking
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Dry handling
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Comfort
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Exterior noise
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%

Costs

Costs
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Rolling resistance
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison