Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Upper-middle

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52

VS

ION Evo

Blizzak 6

9.1

R16 – R22

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

WinterCraft WP52

ION Evo

Blizzak 6

Number of tests

10

1

14

Best position

#2

#1

Average position

12.2

1.0

3.6

Latest test

2024

2025

Available sizes

207

64

188

Wet

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

70%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

64%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Wet braking

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

56%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Wet handling

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Wet circle cornering

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Snow

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Snow traction

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

Snow braking

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Snow handling

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Snow cornering

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Comfort

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

62%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Exterior noise

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

60%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Comfort

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

Costs

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

70%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Rolling resistance

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

65%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Mileage

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

72%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

Price/value

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

83%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Offroad

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

Dry

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

73%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Dry braking

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

83%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Dry handling

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

62%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

WinterCraft WP52

ION Evo

Blizzak 6

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Comfort

Costs

Offroad

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison