Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo vs. Michelin ALPIN 6 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Upper-middle

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52

5.5

R13 – R21

VS

GT

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

UltraGrip Performance 3

Winter

Test Profile

WinterCraft WP52

Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

ALPIN 6

WinterContact TS 870

Number of tests

10

3

31

17

Best position

#2

#3

#1

Average position

12.2

9.7

4.4

1.7

Latest test

2024

2025

Available sizes

207

32

76

80

Performance comparison

Wet Performance

67%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52

59%

GT

Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

75%

Michelin

ALPIN 6

86%

Continental

WinterContact TS 870

Wet Braking

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

92%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

77%

Michelin ALPIN 6

77%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

69%

Wet Handling

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

84%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

53%

Michelin ALPIN 6

84%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

84%

Wet Circle Cornering

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

75%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

59%

Michelin ALPIN 6

75%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

92%

Aquaplaning Longitudinal

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

42%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

50%

Michelin ALPIN 6

65%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

96%

Aquaplaning Cross

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

42%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

57%

Michelin ALPIN 6

73%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

88%

Dry Performance

86%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52

60%

GT

Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

77%

Michelin

ALPIN 6

85%

Continental

WinterContact TS 870

Dry Braking

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

87%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

69%

Michelin ALPIN 6

78%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

78%

Dry Handling

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

84%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

51%

Michelin ALPIN 6

75%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

92%

Snow Performance

71%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52

82%

GT

Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

71%

Michelin

ALPIN 6

87%

Continental

WinterContact TS 870

Snow Braking

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

71%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

90%

Michelin ALPIN 6

81%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

90%

Snow Traction

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

71%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

79%

Michelin ALPIN 6

79%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

88%

Snow Handling

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

69%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

87%

Michelin ALPIN 6

60%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

87%

Snow Circle Cornering

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

73%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

73%

Michelin ALPIN 6

64%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

82%

Comfort & Noise

57%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52

76%

GT

Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

76%

Michelin

ALPIN 6

76%

Continental

WinterContact TS 870

Noise Exterior

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

57%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

76%

Michelin ALPIN 6

76%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

76%

Economy

50%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52

58%

GT

Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

91%

Michelin

ALPIN 6

90%

Continental

WinterContact TS 870

Rolling Resistance

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

57%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

65%

Michelin ALPIN 6

81%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

88%

Mileage

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

42%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

51%

Michelin ALPIN 6

100%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

92%

Tests used in comparison

Organization	Season	Year	Dimension
AUTOBILD	Winter	2024	205/55 R16	View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo vs. Michelin ALPIN 6 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

WinterCraft WP52

Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

ALPIN 6

WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

Performance comparison

Tests used in comparison

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison