18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Kumho WinterCraft WP52Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

WinterCraft WP52

5.5
R13 – R21
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

9.0
R15 – R22
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Also compare with
PILOT ALPIN 5 SportContact 7 WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
10
23
1
3
Best position
#2
#1
#1
#2
Average position
12.2
3.3
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2024
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
207
176
64
34

Wet

Wet
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
56%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Snow

Snow
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Snow traction
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Snow braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Snow handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Snow cornering
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
62%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Interior noise
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
62%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%

Costs

Costs
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Price/value
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Offroad

Offroad
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
74%

Dry

Dry
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
62%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison