18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Kumho WinterCraft WP52Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

WinterCraft WP52

5.5
R13 – R21
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Bridgestone Blizzak 6Premium
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak 6

9.1
R16 – R22
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUVPremium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

9.2
R16 – R22
Also compare with
PILOT ALPIN 5 SportContact 7 WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
Falken
e.Ziex
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
10
3
14
5
Best position
#2
#2
#1
#1
Average position
12.2
3.7
3.6
2.2
Latest test
2024
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
207
34
188
63

Wet

Wet
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
70%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
64%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
56%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Wet handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%

Snow

Snow
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Snow traction
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Snow braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Snow handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Snow cornering
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
60%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Costs

Costs
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
70%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
65%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Mileage
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
72%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Price/value
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
83%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%

Offroad

Offroad
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Gravel traction
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Mud traction
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
76%
Sand traction
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
80%

Dry

Dry
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
62%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison