Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52

VS

Blizzak 6

e.Ziex

9.0

R15 – R21

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

WinterCraft WP52

Blizzak 6

e.Ziex

Number of tests

10

14

3

Best position

#2

#1

#2

Average position

12.2

3.6

3.7

Latest test

2024

2025

Available sizes

207

188

34

Wet

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet braking

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

64%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

56%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet handling

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Wet circle cornering

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Snow

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Snow traction

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

Snow braking

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Snow handling

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Snow cornering

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Comfort

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

62%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

60%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

Costs

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

65%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Price/value

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Offroad

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

Dry

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

62%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Falken e.Ziex

WinterCraft WP52

Blizzak 6

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Comfort

Costs

Offroad

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison