Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Pirelli Cinturato (C3) vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

VS

Cinturato (C3)

e.Ziex

9.0

R15 – R21

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

WinterCraft WP52+

Cinturato (C3)

e.Ziex

Number of tests

3

4

3

Best position

#4

#1

#2

Average position

4.3

3.3

3.7

Latest test

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

97

—

34

Wet

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

94%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

94%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet handling

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

89%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Snow

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Costs

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

87%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

87%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dry

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Comfort

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

89%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Pirelli Cinturato (C3) vs. Falken e.Ziex

WinterCraft WP52+

Cinturato (C3)

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Costs

Dry

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison