18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

WinterCraft WP52+

8.7
R13 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Also compare with
PILOT ALPIN 5 SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
3
1
3
Best position
#4
#1
#2
Average position
4.3
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
97
64
34

Wet

Wet
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Snow

Snow
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%

Dry

Dry
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Costs

Costs
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison