Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Dunlop Winter

Upper-middle

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

WinterCraft WP52+

UltraGrip Performance+

e.Ziex

Winter

Number of tests

3

23

3

2

Best position

#4

#1

#2

#1

Average position

4.3

3.3

3.7

1.5

Latest test

2025

Available sizes

97

176

34

65

Wet

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Wet braking

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Wet circle cornering

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Dunlop Winter

63%

Wet handling

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Dunlop Winter

67%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Dunlop Winter

71%

Snow

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Snow braking

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Snow cornering

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

88%

Dunlop Winter

96%

Snow handling

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Dunlop Winter

79%

Snow traction

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Dunlop Winter

96%

Dry

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dunlop Winter

69%

Dry braking

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Dry handling

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dunlop Winter

64%

Costs

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Dunlop Winter

83%

Rolling resistance

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dunlop Winter

81%

Price/value

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Mileage

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Comfort

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Exterior noise

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Comfort

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Dunlop Winter

WinterCraft WP52+

UltraGrip Performance+

e.Ziex

Winter

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison