Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Upper-middle

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

WinterCraft WP52+

Efficient Grip Performance

ION Evo

UltraGrip Performance+

Number of tests

3

16

1

23

Best position

#4

#3

#1

Average position

4.3

5.5

1.0

3.3

Latest test

2025

2023

2025

Available sizes

97

153

64

176

Wet

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Wet braking

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

76%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Wet circle cornering

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Wet handling

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

87%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

89%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Snow

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Snow braking

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Snow cornering

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

88%

Snow handling

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Snow traction

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Dry

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Dry braking

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Dry handling

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

93%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Costs

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Rolling resistance

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Price/value

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

23%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Mileage

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

64%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Comfort

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

77%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Exterior noise

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

75%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Comfort

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

68%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

WinterCraft WP52+

Efficient Grip Performance

ION Evo

UltraGrip Performance+

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison