Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli P Zero Winter 2

Upper-middle

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

VS

e.Ziex

P Zero Winter 2

9.4

R18 – R22

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

WinterCraft WP52+

e.Ziex

P Zero Winter 2

Number of tests

3

2

Best position

#4

#2

#1

Average position

4.3

3.7

2.0

Latest test

2025

Available sizes

97

34

48

Wet

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Pirelli P Zero Winter 2

83%

Wet handling

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Pirelli P Zero Winter 2

100%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Pirelli P Zero Winter 2

13%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Pirelli P Zero Winter 2

59%

Wet braking

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Pirelli P Zero Winter 2

100%

Wet circle cornering

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Pirelli P Zero Winter 2

100%

Snow

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Pirelli P Zero Winter 2

76%

Dry

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Pirelli P Zero Winter 2

87%

Dry handling

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry braking

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Pirelli P Zero Winter 2

88%

Costs

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Pirelli P Zero Winter 2

71%

Rolling resistance

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Pirelli P Zero Winter 2

73%

Comfort

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Pirelli P Zero Winter 2

100%

Exterior noise

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Pirelli P Zero Winter 2

100%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli P Zero Winter 2

WinterCraft WP52+

e.Ziex

P Zero Winter 2

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison