Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

Upper-middle

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

VS

e.Ziex

Cinturato (C3)

9.4

R16 – R20

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

WinterCraft WP52+

e.Ziex

Cinturato (C3)

Number of tests

3

4

Best position

#4

#2

#1

Average position

4.3

3.7

3.3

Latest test

2025

2026

Available sizes

97

34

—

Wet

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

94%

Wet handling

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

89%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

94%

Wet braking

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

97%

Snow

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Dry

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Dry handling

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Dry braking

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Costs

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

87%

Rolling resistance

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

87%

Comfort

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

89%

Exterior noise

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

WinterCraft WP52+

e.Ziex

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison