18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Test Profile

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Falken
e.Ziex
Michelin
Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Number of tests
3
3
7
Best position
#4
#2
#1
Average position
4.3
3.7
2.4
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
97
34
137

Wet

Wet
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
88%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
94%
Wet braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
90%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
91%
Wet handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
87%

Snow

Snow
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%

Costs

Costs
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
64%
Rolling resistance
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
66%

Dry

Dry
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
86%
Dry braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
84%
Dry handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
91%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
63%
Comfort
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
72%
Exterior noise
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison