18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Dunlop Winter

Test Profile

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Falken
e.Ziex
Dunlop
Winter
Number of tests
3
3
2
Best position
#4
#2
#1
Average position
4.3
3.7
1.5
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
97
34
65

Wet

Wet
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Wet braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Dunlop Winter
63%
Wet handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Dunlop Winter
67%

Snow

Snow
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Dunlop Winter
87%

Costs

Costs
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Rolling resistance
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Dunlop Winter
81%

Dry

Dry
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Dry braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Dry handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dunlop Winter
64%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Exterior noise
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Dunlop Winter
87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison