18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental SportContact 7

Test Profile

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
SportContact 7
Number of tests
3
3
15
Best position
#4
#2
#1
Average position
4.3
3.7
1.2
Latest test
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
97
34
122

Wet

Wet
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Wet handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental SportContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental SportContact 7
66%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental SportContact 7
85%
Wet braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental SportContact 7
95%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental SportContact 7
86%

Snow

Snow
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%

Dry

Dry
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental SportContact 7
91%
Dry handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental SportContact 7
94%
Dry braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental SportContact 7
97%

Costs

Costs
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental SportContact 7
79%
Rolling resistance
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental SportContact 7
79%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental SportContact 7
78%
Comfort
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%
Continental SportContact 7
70%
Exterior noise
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental SportContact 7
75%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison