18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
3
3
26
Best position
#4
#2
#1
Average position
4.3
3.7
2.2
Latest test
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
97
34
66

Wet

Wet
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Wet braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Wet handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%

Snow

Snow
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%

Costs

Costs
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Rolling resistance
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Mileage
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Price/value
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Dry

Dry
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Exterior noise
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison