18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Falken e.Ziex

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

VS

Falken e.Ziex

Falken

e.Ziex

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Falken (58%). In this particular case, the Falken e.Ziex has a better rating of 90% compared to 87% of the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+. The first tyre test of Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ was done in 2025, compared to 2023 when was the Falken e.Ziex first tested.

Test Profile

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

Falken

e.Ziex

Number of tests

3

3

Best position

#4

#2

Average position

4.3

3.7

Latest test

2025

2025

Available sizes

97

34

Wet

Wet

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet handling

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet circle cornering

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Snow

Snow

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Dry

Dry

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry handling

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry braking

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Costs

Costs

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Comfort

Comfort

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison