18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
3
2
3
Best position
#4
#1
#2
Average position
4.3
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
97
23
34

Wet

Wet
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Snow

Snow
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%

Costs

Costs
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dry

Dry
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison