18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Test Profile

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Number of tests
3
23
29
14
Best position
#4
#1
#1
#1
Average position
4.3
6.7
3.7
3.6
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
97
107
178
188

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Wet Braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
59%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
59%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
Wet Handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
59%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
Wet Circle Cornering
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
55%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplaning Cross
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
73%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Dry Performance
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
73%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
86%
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Dry Braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Dry Handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
64%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
91%
Snow Performance
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
83%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Snow Braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Snow Traction
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Snow Handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
96%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Snow Circle Cornering
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Comfort & Noise
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
74%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Noise Exterior
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Ride Comfort
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Economy
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
89%
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Rolling Resistance
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
73%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Mileage
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
96%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2025225/40 R18View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison