18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Solus HA31 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Kumho
Solus HA31
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
3
10
3
Best position
#8
#2
#2
Average position
8.3
6.0
3.7
Latest test
2019
2026
2025
Available sizes
82
104
34

Wet

Wet
Kumho Solus HA31
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Solus HA31
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Kumho Solus HA31
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Solus HA31
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Kumho Solus HA31
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Solus HA31
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%

Snow

Snow
Kumho Solus HA31
67%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Solus HA31
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Solus HA31
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Kumho Solus HA31
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Solus HA31
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Kumho Solus HA31
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Solus HA31
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Kumho Solus HA31
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Kumho Solus HA31
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison