18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Kumho Solus HA31 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Kumho Solus HA31

Kumho

Solus HA31

VS

Firestone Roadhawk 2

Firestone

Roadhawk 2

Hankook ION Evo

Hankook

ION Evo

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Kumho

Solus HA31

Firestone

Roadhawk 2

Hankook

ION Evo

Number of tests

3

6

1

Best position

#8

#3

#1

Average position

8.3

4.7

1.0

Latest test

2019

2026

2025

Available sizes

82

146

64

Wet

Wet

Kumho Solus HA31

69%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Wet braking

Kumho Solus HA31

67%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Wet circle cornering

Kumho Solus HA31

67%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Wet handling

Kumho Solus HA31

73%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho Solus HA31

60%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho Solus HA31

71%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Snow

Snow

Kumho Solus HA31

67%

Costs

Costs

Kumho Solus HA31

75%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolling resistance

Kumho Solus HA31

71%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Dry

Dry

Kumho Solus HA31

56%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry handling

Kumho Solus HA31

53%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

Kumho Solus HA31

59%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Comfort

Comfort

Kumho Solus HA31

81%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Kumho Solus HA31

81%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison