18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Kumho Solus HA31 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Kumho Solus HA31

Kumho

Solus HA31

VS

Firestone Roadhawk 2

Firestone

Roadhawk 2

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Kumho allround tyres are slightly better rated (55%) than Firestone (0%). The first tyre test of Kumho Solus HA31 was done in 2016, compared to 2024 when was the Firestone Roadhawk 2 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho Solus HA31 has C wet grip rating, whereas 98% of Firestone Roadhawk 2 has A rating.

Test Profile

Kumho

Solus HA31

Firestone

Roadhawk 2

Number of tests

3

6

Best position

#8

#3

Average position

8.3

4.7

Latest test

2019

2026

Available sizes

82

146

Wet

Wet

Kumho Solus HA31

69%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho Solus HA31

71%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Wet braking

Kumho Solus HA31

67%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Wet circle cornering

Kumho Solus HA31

67%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Wet handling

Kumho Solus HA31

73%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho Solus HA31

60%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Snow

Snow

Kumho Solus HA31

67%

Costs

Costs

Kumho Solus HA31

75%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Rolling resistance

Kumho Solus HA31

71%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

Comfort

Comfort

Kumho Solus HA31

81%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Exterior noise

Kumho Solus HA31

81%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Dry

Dry

Kumho Solus HA31

56%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Dry braking

Kumho Solus HA31

59%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

Dry handling

Kumho Solus HA31

53%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison