18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Kumho Solus HA31 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Kumho Solus HA31

Kumho

Solus HA31

VS

Falken e.Ziex

Falken

e.Ziex

Firestone Roadhawk 2

Firestone

Roadhawk 2

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Kumho

Solus HA31

Falken

e.Ziex

Firestone

Roadhawk 2

Number of tests

3

3

6

Best position

#8

#2

#3

Average position

8.3

3.7

4.7

Latest test

2019

2025

2026

Available sizes

82

34

146

Wet

Wet

Kumho Solus HA31

69%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Wet handling

Kumho Solus HA31

73%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho Solus HA31

60%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho Solus HA31

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Wet braking

Kumho Solus HA31

67%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Wet circle cornering

Kumho Solus HA31

67%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Snow

Snow

Kumho Solus HA31

67%

Costs

Costs

Kumho Solus HA31

75%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Rolling resistance

Kumho Solus HA31

71%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

Comfort

Comfort

Kumho Solus HA31

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Exterior noise

Kumho Solus HA31

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Dry

Dry

Kumho Solus HA31

56%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Dry braking

Kumho Solus HA31

59%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

Dry handling

Kumho Solus HA31

53%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison