18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Solus HA31 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone allround tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than Kumho (55%). The first tyre test of Kumho Solus HA31 was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Bridgestone Turanza T005 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho Solus HA31 has C wet grip rating, whereas 68% of Bridgestone Turanza T005 has A rating.

Test Profile

Kumho
Solus HA31
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Number of tests
3
33
Best position
#8
#1
Average position
8.3
4.1
Latest test
2019
2025
Available sizes
82
658

Wet

Wet
Kumho Solus HA31
69%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
Wet handling
Kumho Solus HA31
73%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Solus HA31
60%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Solus HA31
71%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%
Wet braking
Kumho Solus HA31
67%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Solus HA31
67%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%

Snow

Snow
Kumho Solus HA31
67%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Solus HA31
75%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
Mileage
Kumho Solus HA31
77%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
69%
Price/value
Kumho Solus HA31
88%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
53%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Solus HA31
71%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
93%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Solus HA31
81%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
76%
Exterior noise
Kumho Solus HA31
81%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
62%
Comfort
Kumho Solus HA31
56%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
66%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Solus HA31
56%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Dry braking
Kumho Solus HA31
59%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
Dry handling
Kumho Solus HA31
53%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison