18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Kumho Solus HA31 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex

Kumho Solus HA31

Kumho

Solus HA31

VS

BFGoodrich Advantage

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Falken e.Ziex

Falken

e.Ziex

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Kumho

Solus HA31

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Falken

e.Ziex

Number of tests

3

14

3

Best position

#8

#8

#2

Average position

8.3

13.4

3.7

Latest test

2019

2026

2025

Available sizes

82

153

34

Wet

Wet

Kumho Solus HA31

69%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet circle cornering

Kumho Solus HA31

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet handling

Kumho Solus HA31

73%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho Solus HA31

60%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho Solus HA31

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Kumho Solus HA31

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Snow

Snow

Kumho Solus HA31

67%

Costs

Costs

Kumho Solus HA31

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Mileage

Kumho Solus HA31

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Price/value

Kumho Solus HA31

88%

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Rolling resistance

Kumho Solus HA31

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Comfort

Comfort

Kumho Solus HA31

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Kumho Solus HA31

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Kumho Solus HA31

56%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Dry

Dry

Kumho Solus HA31

56%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Kumho Solus HA31

59%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Kumho Solus HA31

53%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison