18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Solus HA31 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Kumho
Solus HA31
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
3
14
3
Best position
#8
#8
#2
Average position
8.3
13.4
3.7
Latest test
2019
2026
2025
Available sizes
82
153
34

Wet

Wet
Kumho Solus HA31
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Solus HA31
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Kumho Solus HA31
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Solus HA31
60%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Solus HA31
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Kumho Solus HA31
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Snow

Snow
Kumho Solus HA31
67%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Solus HA31
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Kumho Solus HA31
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Price/value
Kumho Solus HA31
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Solus HA31
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Solus HA31
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Kumho Solus HA31
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Kumho Solus HA31
56%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Solus HA31
56%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Kumho Solus HA31
59%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Kumho Solus HA31
53%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison