18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Solus HA31 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich allround tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Kumho (55%). The first tyre test of Kumho Solus HA31 was done in 2016, compared to 2021 when was the BFGoodrich Advantage first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho Solus HA31 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of BFGoodrich Advantage has A rating.

Test Profile

Kumho
Solus HA31
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Number of tests
3
14
Best position
#8
#8
Average position
8.3
13.4
Latest test
2019
2026
Available sizes
82
153

Wet

Wet
Kumho Solus HA31
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Wet handling
Kumho Solus HA31
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Solus HA31
60%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Solus HA31
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Wet braking
Kumho Solus HA31
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Solus HA31
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%

Snow

Snow
Kumho Solus HA31
67%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Solus HA31
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Mileage
Kumho Solus HA31
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Price/value
Kumho Solus HA31
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Solus HA31
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Solus HA31
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Exterior noise
Kumho Solus HA31
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Comfort
Kumho Solus HA31
56%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Solus HA31
56%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Dry braking
Kumho Solus HA31
59%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Dry handling
Kumho Solus HA31
53%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison