18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho HA32 Solus 4S vs. Viking Fourtech vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2

Test Profile

Kumho
HA32 Solus 4S
Viking
Fourtech
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Number of tests
9
5
1
4
24
Best position
#5
#11
#1
#2
#1
Average position
10.8
17.0
1.0
3.3
2.7
Latest test
2023
2021
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
73
32
27
40
151

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
67%
Viking Fourtech
70%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
68%
Viking Fourtech
77%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Wet braking
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
61%
Viking Fourtech
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
71%
Viking Fourtech
55%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Wet handling
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
70%
Viking Fourtech
59%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
62%
Viking Fourtech
96%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Snow
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
71%
Viking Fourtech
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Snow cornering
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
58%
Viking Fourtech
67%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
93%
Snow handling
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
67%
Viking Fourtech
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Snow traction
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
72%
Viking Fourtech
51%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
76%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Snow braking
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
81%
Viking Fourtech
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
90%
Comfort
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
76%
Viking Fourtech
76%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Exterior noise
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
80%
Viking Fourtech
76%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Comfort
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Costs
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
65%
Viking Fourtech
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Price/value
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
83%
Viking Fourtech
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Mileage
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
70%
Viking Fourtech
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Rolling resistance
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
59%
Viking Fourtech
96%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Dry
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
68%
Viking Fourtech
59%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Dry braking
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
63%
Viking Fourtech
47%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Dry handling
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
73%
Viking Fourtech
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store