18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho HA32 Solus 4S vs. Viking Fourtech vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2

Test Profile

Kumho
HA32 Solus 4S
Viking
Fourtech
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Number of tests
9
5
4
1
24
Best position
#5
#11
#2
#1
#1
Average position
10.8
17.0
3.3
1.0
2.7
Latest test
2023
2021
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
73
32
40
66
151

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
67%
Viking Fourtech
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
71%
Viking Fourtech
55%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Wet handling
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
70%
Viking Fourtech
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
68%
Viking Fourtech
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Wet braking
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
61%
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
62%
Viking Fourtech
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Snow
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
71%
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Snow braking
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
81%
Viking Fourtech
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
90%
Snow cornering
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
58%
Viking Fourtech
67%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
93%
Snow handling
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
67%
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Snow traction
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
72%
Viking Fourtech
51%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Comfort
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
76%
Viking Fourtech
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Exterior noise
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
80%
Viking Fourtech
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Comfort
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Costs
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
65%
Viking Fourtech
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Mileage
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
70%
Viking Fourtech
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Price/value
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
83%
Viking Fourtech
77%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Rolling resistance
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
59%
Viking Fourtech
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Dry
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
68%
Viking Fourtech
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Dry handling
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
73%
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Dry braking
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
63%
Viking Fourtech
47%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store