Comparison: Kumho HA32 Solus 4S vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3

Today we are comparing two highly rated all-round tyres, the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S and the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Starting with the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S, which is produced by the Kumho company in CN. The tyre is rated 73% by our experts. It has received positive remarks for its exterior noise levels, good snow braking, high mileage and favourable price. Nevertheless, it falls short in the areas of aquaplaning reserves and rolling resistance, resulting in slightly extended wet and dry braking distances. In the Autobild test, it secured 11th position out of 32 tyres tested.

The second tyre we are comparing is the Michelin CrossClimate 2, produced by the Michelin company in IT and ES. This tyre is rated 96% by our experts and has outperformed the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S by securing first position in the Autobild tyre test. The Michelin CrossClimate 2 shines with excellent dry braking, superior snow handling, and considerably lower exterior noise. However, it's worth noting that the higher price is its main drawback.

As both tyres are all-round, their performance on different surfaces is critical. While the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S performs excellently in snow and quiet performance, it struggles with aquaplaning scenarios and has incremented wet and dry braking distances, compromising its performance in slippery conditions. The Michelin CrossClimate 2 on the other hand, has commendable performance on dry and snowy roads, but a higher purchase price might sway budget-conscious buyers.

Although these two tyres both have their respective strengths and weaknesses, it is clear that the Michelin CrossClimate 2 outperforms the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S in overall performance and expert rating. However, the latter offers a valuable alternative for those looking for a robust all-round tyre with less budget.

A careful consideration of your driving conditions and individual requirements should guide your choice between these two quality tyres.