Comparison: Kumho HA32 Solus 4S vs. Fulda MultiControl vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2

The following is a brief comparison of the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S and the Fulda MultiControl, two allround tyres. Both these tyres are from renowned manufacturers, Kumho and Fulda respectively.

Kumho HA32 Solus 4S

Made in China, the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S allround tyre rated 64% on our site. Some of its best features, as per the AutoBild test, include external noise, snow braking, mileage and price/value ratio, placing it in the 10th position out of 32 tyres total in the test. The tyre is known for its good snow traction, safe wet and dry handling, quiet rolling noise, and low price ("Gute Schneetraktion,\n sicheres Nassund\n Trockenhandling,\n leises\n Abrollgeräusch,\n niedriger Preis.") However, it was marked down for moderate aquaplaning reserves and slightly prolonged wet/dry braking distances ("Mäßige Aquaplaningreserven,\n leicht\n verlängerte Nass-/\n Trockenbremswege,\n erhöhter\n Rollwiderstand"). It's important to note that the tyre has not been replaced with a newer model yet.

Fulda MultiControl

On the other hand, Fulda MultiControl, another allround tyre, scored much lower in our rating, getting only 6%. In the AutoBild test, it ended up at the 26th position. Currently, there are no details available about its specific strengths or weaknesses. Similar to the Kumho tyre, there is no newer model that replaced this tyre as of now.

Verdict

From the available data, it appears that the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S generally performs better in tests than the Fulda MultiControl. Besides, customers seem to appreciate the former for its high price-value ratio. Therefore, the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S could be a better overall choice for consumers looking for an allround tyre with a good blend of performance and affordability. However, it is advisable that consumers refer to the latest test data and reviews to ensure they make the best tyre choice to meet their individual driving needs.