18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho HA32 Solus 4S vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Kumho
HA32 Solus 4S
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
9
8
1
4
Best position
#5
#3
#1
#2
Average position
10.8
5.0
1.0
3.8
Latest test
2023
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
73
146
66
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet braking
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Wet handling
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
47%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
62%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Falken e.Ziex
56%
Comfort
Confidence
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Exterior noise
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
50%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Comfort
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
90%
Costs
Confidence
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
65%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
64%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
Price/value
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Mileage
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Rolling resistance
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
59%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Dry
Confidence
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Dry handling
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Dry braking
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.