18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho HA32 Solus 4S vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Kumho
HA32 Solus 4S
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
9
3
1
Best position
#5
#2
#1
Average position
10.8
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2023
2025
2025
Available sizes
73
34
64

Wet

Wet
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
67%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet braking
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
61%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
71%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet handling
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
70%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
62%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%

Snow

Snow
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
71%
Snow braking
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
81%
Snow cornering
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
58%
Snow handling
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
67%
Snow traction
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
72%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Costs

Costs
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
65%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Mileage
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
70%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Price/value
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
83%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Rolling resistance
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
59%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Dry

Dry
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
68%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
63%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
73%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison