18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Kumho (59%). In this particular case, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 has a better rating of 91% compared to 87% of the Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72). The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) was done in 2025, compared to 2021 when was the Michelin CrossClimate 2 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) has A wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Michelin CrossClimate 2 has B rating.

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Number of tests
3
24
Best position
#1
#1
Average position
4.0
2.7
Latest test
2026
2025
Available sizes
54
151

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
62%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
52%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
52%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
76%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
76%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison